The answer becomes actionable
Known situation
When internal memory, sources and the workflow cover the request, the team receives the applicable position and the actions it is authorised to take.
Known work moves without recreating an approval.
Operational productivity · Legal memory
Mirmi turns company decisions, policies, approvals and documents into actionable answers at the moment of work. Sales, Procurement, Marketing, Partnerships, HR and M&A handle covered requests; exceptions reach the right decision-maker with their context.
Less waiting on recurring questions, fewer back-and-forths and a clear route to Legal.
Product proof · business team view
MSA · Acme France · v3
Termination
Clause 7 · Termination
Termination notice: thirty (30) days sixty (60) days
The change is supported by positive precedents. For this case, the workflow authorises the team to accept, reject or ask Legal.
2 precedents
Nova Cloud MSA
#1842
Same agreement type and comparable reciprocity.
“Either party may terminate with sixty (60) days’ notice.”
Orion Platform Agreement
#1716
Position approved in a comparable context.
Guided autonomy
Known situation
When internal memory, sources and the workflow cover the request, the team receives the applicable position and the actions it is authorised to take.
Known work moves without recreating an approval.
Sensitive exception
For a deviation, exceeded threshold or sensitive question, Mirmi assembles the evidence and routes the matter to the designated decision-maker.
The right decision-maker receives a contextualised exception.
New situation
For a new situation, Mirmi assembles the available sources. Legal’s decision then enriches the memory for future requests.
The next similar request can start from a precedent.
Six operational contexts
The company shares one legal memory; the documents, decisions and expected outcomes adapt to each team’s work.
Customer agreements
Shorten negotiation loops by retrieving positions already accepted, then hand exceptions over with their commercial context.
Supplier agreements
Negotiate and renew faster by retrieving approved supplier compromises, obligations and deadlines.
Campaigns and content
Reuse approvals for claims, image rights, promotions or data use so covered campaigns can launch faster.
Alliances and distribution
Structure agreements faster by retrieving positions on exclusivity, intellectual property, co-marketing and liability.
Internal questions · HR policy knowledge
Answer recurring questions from applicable policies, precedents and sources while reserving sensitive individual situations for HR or Legal.
Corpus review · M&A
Prepare expert review faster by retrieving clauses, decisions and attention points to confirm within a defined source set.
What authorises the action
The score qualifies the change as a whole; the workflow then determines the available actions.
Visible actions come from the server, based on the applicable template, threshold and workflow. The user keeps the final decision and can still escalate whenever that action is authorised.
How to read a case
Change score
It applies to the analysed change as a whole.
Precedent similarity
It belongs to each reference and helps assess comparability.
Permissions
The workflow determines which actions are actually available.
Human decision
The team accepts, rejects or asks Legal, and the action is recorded.
Operational impact
A documented position becomes immediately reusable by authorised teams.
Teams get the context, sources and next action while they are working.
Decisions draw on qualified precedents and a shared framework.
When Legal steps in, it receives the question, available sources and the reason for escalation.
Frequently asked questions
No. When a request is covered and the workflow authorises the action, a team can move without recreating a Legal request. Legal remains available and takes over when a case falls outside the framework.
The score qualifies the change; the workflow opens the available actions and a person chooses.
Autonomous acceptance is not offered. Depending on the permissions returned by the workflow, the team can reject the change or request Legal approval.
No. Similarity describes each precedent. The score applies to the overall change, and authorisation still depends on the applicable template and workflow.
The framework approved by the organisation: templates, thresholds, roles and workflows. The interface then displays the capabilities authorised by the server for that case.
We define the sources, users, decision routes and success criteria with your teams, then open the scope progressively.
Start with one request that slows the team down
Choose one request family. We will connect its decisions, sources, authorised actions and escalation route so the time returned can be measured.