MirmiAbout
It all started with a shared frustration.
In every company we met, the same scene played out. A contract in negotiation, a sensitive clause… and someone asking:
"Wait, which client did we already accept this for?"
Silence. A desperate dig through folders, old Word versions, emails. An overworked lawyer, a sales rep in a hurry, a hesitating manager. And in the end: everyone starts over, even though the company already had the answer.
That's how Mirmi was born. Not as yet another tool. Not as another CLM. But as a simple idea: the company has to be able to remember.
Remember what it negotiated, what it accepted, what it rejected, and why. Because a company that forgets its own decisions loses time, consistency, peace of mind and growth.
- Critical decisions buried in documents, emails and individual memories.
- Teams redoing the same analyses from one client to the next.
- Legal positions that vary by deal, subsidiary or time period.
We set out to build a living contract memory that makes those decisions visible, reusable and shareable.
Alex, Igor and the team decided to fix it.
They come from different worlds but share one obsession: putting AI at the service of calmer decisions, not more complexity.
Alex Hayem
Experienced entrepreneur, former CEO in mobility and cybersecurity.
Used to complex sales cycles, he spent months listening to 150+ lawyers, salespeople, COOs and LegalOps tell him… the same story: important decisions lost in the daily flow.
Dr. Igor Korostil
PhD in AI, expert in open-source models and document analysis.
He knew the answer wasn't an AI that invents, but an AI that compares, understands and illuminates. An AI that surfaces a scattered contract memory rather than replaces it.
GARY COUVRAND
Software engineer and application systems architect, full-stack expert.
He knew that the best AI in the world is nothing without a robust system to use it and an understandable, simple customer experience. His obsession? Making Mirmi AI ever more intuitive and easy to integrate into the operational workflows our clients already use every day.
Together, they built an intelligent engine that doesn't generate and doesn't hallucinate.
Instead of inventing answers, Mirmi retrieves, compares and ranks what your organization has already negotiated. It informs your trade-offs with your own precedents, your own positions and your own limits.
Our values
What guides how we build Mirmi.
We build a product for demanding teams: legal, sales, operations. Our technology and design choices are guided by a few simple but non-negotiable principles.
1. Clarity
The legal world is complex. The tools supporting it shouldn't be.
Mirmi simplifies without dumbing down, explains without overloading, illuminates without replacing. Every feature serves a clear goal: helping teams move forward.
2. Sovereignty
Your contract decisions are a strategic asset. They have nothing to do in external models.
We never transfer, train on or reuse your data. The AI runs locally, hosting is in France, on-premise is possible. Your memory stays entirely yours.
3. Technological restraint
No fuzzy magic. No AI that invents. No useless complexity.
We build an analysis AI, not a generation AI. It understands, compares, retrieves — and lets humans decide.
4. Trust
We want a tool that lawyers respect as much as sales teams adopt.
A tool that never betrays what the document actually says. A tool you can safely base important decisions on.
5. Immediate usefulness
A contract signed too late is a fragile deal. An overloaded lawyer is a slowed-down organization.
Every minute saved in negotiation has real business impact. Mirmi is designed to deliver value from day one, without an endless rollout.
Want to write the next chapter with us?
Why "Mirmi"?
In Norse mythology, Mímir is the god of wisdom and memory, the one others came to consult when they sought to understand, decide or move forward.
We chose Mirmi because we believe this consultation can be proactive: instead of having to go find the information, it comes to you, at the right moment, in the right contract.
That's exactly what an internal legal memory should be: a reliable, precise, always-available reference. A memory that doesn't replace lawyers, but finally gives them the means to build on everything they've already produced.